- Cited — Mark Mitchell & Anor. v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-03-10
“…ll be admitted in evidence even if it was unlawfully obtained by the person seeking to rely upon it: see in particular Imerman v Tchenguiz [2019] EWCA Civ 908, [2011] Fam 116.…”
- Cited — Candey Limited v Basem Bosheh & Anor 2022-08-01
“…The leading case is Imerman v Tchenquiz [2010] EWCA Civ 908; [2011] Fam 116, in which it was held that it was a breach of confidence for a person intentionally to obtain another person’s information secretly, and without authorisation,…”
- Cited — Candey Limited v Basem Bosheh & Anor 2022-08-01
“…ll be admitted in evidence even if it was unlawfully obtained by the person seeking to rely upon it: see in particular Imerman v Tchenguiz [2019] EWCA Civ 908, [2011] Fam 116.…”
- Cited — Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy 2022-03-02
“…[2011] Fam 116,…”
- Cited — Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors 2021-03-25
“…rmation by allowing them to see it, is in itself an incursion into the right of privacy for which there must be a proper justification: see Imerman v Tchenguiz [2011] Fam 116 CA at paras.[69], [72] & [149];…”
- Cited — DSM SFG Group Holdings Ltd & Ors v Kelly 2019-12-19
“…d the effect of allowing the use of confidential material before the right to do so had been established, see Imerman v. Tchenguiz and ors [2010] EWCA Civ 908, [2011] Fam 116 at [142]. In effect, the order granted the respondent summary judgement on the issue of confidentiality, subject to reservations whose effect was necessarily u…”