How many times has [2011] QB 744 been cited?

[2011] QB 744 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] QB 744

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2011] QB 744

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Applied · 1

Cited — Wingfield, R (on the application of) v Canterbury City Council & Anor 2020-11-27
“…In Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2011] QB 744, Lord Judge C.J. held that the Kapferer case laid down a general principle that EU law does not require a national court to re-open a final judicial decision e…”
Applied — Micula & Ors v Romania (Rev 1) 2018-07-27
“…An example of the principle being applied by the UK courts is provided by the decision of the Divisional Court in Interfact v Liverpool City Council [2011] QB 744.…”