- Cited — Moss v Information Commissioner 2020-05-15
“… this jurisdiction”. Several other authorities emphasise a test of necessity: see JIH at [21(4)], cited above; Lord Dyson at [11] in Al-Rawi v Security Service [2012] 1 AC 531 (SC), citing Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 (HL):…”
- Cited — Arkin v Marshall 2020-05-11
“…In Al-Rawi v. Security Service [2011] UKSC 34, [2012] 1 AC 531, Lord Dyson said at [22] that “[t]he basic rule is that (subject to certain established and limited exceptions) the court cannot exercise its power to regulate…”
- Cited — Singh, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-06-18
“…le that the court must exercise its power to regulate its procedure in a way which respects that principle: see e.g. Al Rawi v Security Service [2011] UKSC 34; [2012] 1 AC 531, para 22.…”
- Cited — SPI North Ltd v Swiss Post International (UK) Ltd & Anor (Rev 1) 2019-01-17
“…Mr Sachdeva referred us in this connection to the judgment of this court in Al Rawi vSecurity Service [2010] EWCA Civ 482, [2012] 1 AC 531, at [18], where Lord Neuberger MR said:…”
- Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority (CMA) v Concordia International RX (UK) 2018-08-07
“…Al Rawi case [2012] 1 AC 531…”
- Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority (CMA) v Concordia International RX (UK) 2018-08-07
“…ly, judicial review must accommodate a closed material procedure, where the material could be seen by the judge but not Concordia. The Supreme Court in Al Rawi [2012] 1 AC 531 (which prohibited the use of a closed material procedure other than in cases where there was ‘parliamentary authorisation’) [52] was not directing its attentio…”