How many times has [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 87 been cited?

[2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 87 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 87

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 2

Followed — Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Limited & Ors v Tughans 2023-08-31
“… is no need for any formal permission to amend: [20]-[22] following Eder J in Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA ("The Mahakam") [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm) [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87 at [15]. The refinement he allowed in that case was to make clear that what was drafted as a question of law by reference to a notional contract term should be…”
Followed — Sharp Corp Limited v Viterra BV (previously known as Glencore Agriculture BV) 2023-01-11
“… is no need for any formal permission to amend: [20]-[22] following Eder J in Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA (“The Mahakam”) [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm) [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 87 at [15]. The refinement he allowed in that case was to make clear that what was drafted as a question of law by reference to a notional contract term should be…”