How many times has [2012] 1 WLR 306 been cited?

[2012] 1 WLR 306 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] 1 WLR 306

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2012] 1 WLR 306

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Considered — XW v XH 2019-04-02
“…K v L [2012] 1 WLR 306, [2011] EWCA Civ 550 is the only case which has been reported to date which specifically considered the need for substantial anonymisation and redaction in the…”
Cited — Waggott v Waggott 2018-04-11
“…ture financial differences between the parties could or would constitute discrimination, it is relevant to repeat what Wilson LJ (as he then was) said in K v L [2012] 1 WLR 306, 313C/D:…”