- Explained — RACHEL RILEY v MICHAEL SIVIER 2023-02-01
“…lar defamatory detail (the kind of case relied on in the written argument, which cites Lord Dyson’s observations in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11 [2012] 2 AC 273 [194]). To get this complaint off the ground Mr Sivier has to explain how “editorial judgment” could have had some bearing on whether it was reasonable for him…”
- Approved — Rachel Riley v Laura Murray 2022-08-11
“…rest in their disclosure” (Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127, 176-177 (Lord Bingham CJ), approved in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11, [2012] 2 AC 273[33] (Lord Phillips)). But the overall criterion identified by Lord Bingham was a broad one: “matters relating to the public life of the community and those who…”
- Cited — Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors 2019-05-17
“…ined of was in the public interest. The intention in this provision is to reflect the existing common law as most recently set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [[2012] 2 AC 273]. It reflects the fact that the common law test contained both a subjective element — what the defendant believed was in the public interest at the time of pub…”
- Cited — Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors 2019-05-17
“…plained in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2000] EMLR, [2001] 2 AC 127 at pp.176-177 (in a passage cited by Lord Phillips in Flood v The Times [2002] UKSC 11, [2012] 2 AC 273 at [33]):…”
- Cited — Economou v De Freitas 2018-11-21
“…[2003], 1 AC 300, Jameel (Mohammed) and anor v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2006] UKHL 44, [2007] 1 AC 359 and Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11, [2012] 2 AC 273, were of relevance to the interpretation of section 4. Though the point was uncontroversial before us, in my view, this is the correct approach.…”