How many times has [2013] 1 AC 236 been cited?

[2013] 1 AC 236 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] 1 AC 236

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2013] 1 AC 236

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Explained · 1

Cited — Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) v Central Bank of Venezuela & Ors 2023-06-30
“…choed by Flaux CHC in Ward v Savill [2021] EWCA Civ 1378 at [73]-[74] and could be seen in the Supreme Court decision in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46; [2013] 1 AC 236 at [129].…”
Explained — Strategic Technologies PTE Ltd v Procurement Bureau of the Republic of China Ministry of National Defence 2020-11-30
“…eign court is by an action on the judgment. The theoretical basis for this was explained by Lord Collins of Mapesbury in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46, [2013] 1 AC 236 at [9]:…”
Cited — Bakhshiyeva (Foreign Representative of the Ojsc International Bank of Azerbaijan) v Sberbank of Russia & Ors 2018-12-18
“…ourt. It is only fair to add, however, that this second objection was decisively rejected by Lord Collins of Mapesbury in Rubin vEurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46, [2013] 1 AC 236, (“Rubin”) at [126].…”