How many times has [2013] 1 WLR 1183 been cited?

[2013] 1 WLR 1183 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] 1 WLR 1183

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2013] 1 WLR 1183

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Manolete Partners PLC v Ebrahim Dalal 2023-03-14
“…Counsel for Manolete relied upon the statement of principle of Toulson LJ in Milton Keynes Borough Council v McNulty [2013] EWCA Civ 15, [2013] 1 WLR 1183 at [35]:…”
Considered — A (Children) 2018-07-25
“…Recently (and after A County Council v M&F), in Nulty Deceased v Milton Keynes Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 15, [2013] 1 WLR 1183 Lord Justice Toulson (as he then was) considered the use of an arithmetical approach to the standard of proof. Having first considered Popi M hewent on:…”