How many times has [2013] 2 AC 108 been cited?

[2013] 2 AC 108 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] 2 AC 108

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2013] 2 AC 108

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Amarjit Bhaur & Ors v Equity First Trustees (Nevis) Limited & Ors 2023-05-18
“…is of the law on the setting aside of voluntary dispositions for mistake. The leading authority in the area is the decision of the Supreme Court in Pitt v Holt [2013] 2 AC 108.…”
Cited — FSHC Group Holdings Ltd v Glas Trust Corporation Ltd (Rev 1) 2019-07-31
“…Mr Masefield also cited a passing observation of Lord Walker in Pitt v Holt [2013] UKSC 26; [2013] 2 AC 108, para 131, that:…”
Cited — Lehtimäki v The Children's Investment Fund Foundation (UK) & Ors 2018-07-06
“…ore making a decision, of matters which are relevant to the decision”. As, however, Lord Walker (as he had by then become) noted in Pitt v Holt [2013] UKSC 26, [2013] 2 AC 108 (at paragraph 73), it is not enough to justify judicial intervention to show that “the trustees’ deliberations have fallen short of the highest possible standa…”