How many times has [2013] 2 AC 48 been cited?

[2013] 2 AC 48 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] 2 AC 48

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2013] 2 AC 48

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Considered — RN, R (on the application of) v First tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) & Anor 2023-07-28
“…n act “of a violent nature” under paragraph 2(1)(b), the UTJ considered the relevant authorities which included R (Jones) v First Tier Tribunal [2013] UKSC 19; [2013] 2 AC 48 (“Jones”) and C, Petitioner [1999] SC 551 and accepted that the consequences of a crime are not determinative of the issue of violence. The UTJ appears to have…”
Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v The Office of Communications 2018-11-14
“…ragraph 16, Regina (Cart) v. Upper Tribunal [2012] 1 AC 663, [2011] UKSC 28; Regina (Jones) v. First Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) [2013] UKSC 19; [2013] 2 AC 48 per Lord Carnwath at paragraph 41).…”
Cited — The British Council v Jeffery & Ors 2018-10-16
“…tention also to a passage in the judgment of Lord Carnwath in the Supreme Court in R (Jones) v First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) [2013] UKSC 29, [2013] 2 AC 48. The issue before the Court was the meaning of the phrase “a crime of violence” in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme, and in that context the issue aro…”