How many times has (2013) 57 EHRR 8 been cited?

(2013) 57 EHRR 8 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2013) 57 EHRR 8

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2013) 57 EHRR 8

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 2Cited · 1

Cited — Dulgheriu & Anor v The London Borough of Ealing 2019-08-21
“…was confined to its particular facts and had been, in any event, superseded by more recent authority. Mr Havers cited, in that context, Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 and Barankevich v Russia (2008) 47 EHRR 8.…”
Considered — Ngole, R (on the application of) v The University of Sheffield 2019-07-03
“…egitimate aim where the objective of a profession was concerned. In reaching this conclusion, she analysed the four cases considered in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8. In each, the importance of providing a public service without discrimination was highlighted. Though the facts in each case were considerably different to the…”
Considered — Kuteh v Dartford And Gravesham NHS Trust 2019-05-14
“…Mr Diamond also reminded this Court of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Eweida and Others v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8. In particular he cited paras. 79-94, which have been considered by the courts of this country in subsequent caselaw. I do not find anything of assistance in t…”