How many times has [2014] 1 WLR 4620 been cited?

[2014] 1 WLR 4620 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2014] 1 WLR 4620

· cited by 4 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2014] 1 WLR 4620

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 4

Cited — ZK v London Borough of Redbridge 2020-12-01
“…2014] EWCA Civ 827, [2014] 1 WLR 4620…”
Cited — FB (Afghanistan) & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-10-21
“…R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827; [2014] 1 WLR 4620 involved a challenge to the Secretary of State for Justice’s policy for the review of prison licence conditions on the basis that it failed to give the prisone…”
Cited — Bayer Plc & Anor v NHS Darlington CCG & Ors 2020-03-25
“…f State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 1481, [2005] 1 WLR 2219, and R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, [2014] 1 WLR 4620, to which we were also referred, was likewise different. In both cases the policy-maker had, or had undertaken, the responsibility of prescribing the procedure…”
Cited — EM, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-15
“…[2014] 1 WLR 4620 at paragraphs 38 and 45, when it observed that a policy could only be struck down if it was "inherently unfair". That case also established that if a policy is…”