How many times has [2015] A.C. 1471 been cited?

[2015] A.C. 1471 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2015] A.C. 1471

· cited by 2 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2015] A.C. 1471

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Bullale v City of Westminster Council 2020-11-25
“…ssages of the judgment of Lord Reed, with whom Baroness Hale and Lord Clarke agreed and with whose reasons Lord Neuberger agreed, in Haile v Waltham Forest LBC [2015] A.C. 1471:…”
Cited — Bullale v City of Westminster Council 2020-11-25
“…ry accommodation obtain priority in the provision of housing to which they are not entitled (see per Lord Reed in Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2015] A.C. 1471 at paragraphs 61 and 22). As Simon Brown J, as he then was, expressed it in R v London Borough of Merton ex p. Ruffle (1998) 21 H.L.R. 361 at page 366:…”