“… standard of health care equivalent to that generally provided to the population as a whole (R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 19; [2016] 1 WLR 1717 at [29]; and Rooman v Belgium (European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) Application No 18052/11) [2019] ECHR 105).…”
“…bmissions before this court focussed on two of those decisions, that of the Supreme Court in R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 19, [2016] 1 WLR 1717, handed down some two months after the judge’s decision in this case, and that of this court in R (Das) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Mind and …”
“…ase”), with the agreement of a majority of the court. It was also endorsed by Lord Wilson in R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 19, [2016] 1 WLR 1717 at [46], decided since the judge’s decision in this case. In Lumba’s case Lord Dyson JSC encapsulated the Hardial Singh principles thus:…”