UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2016] 1 WLR 4375
[2016] 1 WLR 4375
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2016] 1 WLR 4375
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Followed · 1
Cited · 1
Citation network
[2016] 1 WLR 4375
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury
ZXC v Bloomberg LP
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
ZXC v Bloomberg LP
2020-05-15
“…[2016] 1 WLR 4375…”
Followed
—
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury
2019-03-15
“…In general terms, the right to inspect documents, under CPR Part 31.14 and following, is not unqualified: National Crime Agency v Abacha [2016] EWCA Civ 760; [2016] 1 WLR 4375, at [30]. In that case, I went on to say (at [31]):…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1986] 1 Ch 482
1×
[1991] 1 WLR 607
1×
[2014] AC 700
1×
Bank Mellat v Her Majesty's Treasury (No 1) [2013] UKSC 38
1×