- Cited — Griffiths v Tickle & Ors 2021-12-10
“…infliction of harm: [2014] EWCA Civ 1277, [2015] EMLR 4. The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the father and restored the decision of Bean J: [2015] UKSC 32, [2016] AC 219. It is not necessary to discuss the claim in negligence but some consideration of the other two claims is of value.…”
- Cited — Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter 2021-03-11
“…ty [2014] EWHC 2974 (Admin), [78] in the context of a solicitor’s breach of the Solicitors Code of Conduct and O (a child) v Rhodes and another [2015] UKSC 32, [2016] AC 219, [84] in the context of the tort of intentionally causing physical or psychological harm.…”
- Cited — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…not being specified in order to make it more difficult to identify the claimant. As a result of the decision of the Supreme Court (Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32, [2016] AC 219)we now know that it was US law.…”
- Applied — Rees & Ors v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis 2018-07-05
“…d [1898] AC 1, 171. (For a recent discussion of the nineteenth century understanding of the meaning of “malicious” in the law of tort, see O (A Child) v Rhodes [2016] AC 219, paras 37-41.) As applied to malicious prosecution, it requires the claimant to prove that the defendant deliberately misused the process of the court. The mos…”
- Cited — RSM (A Child), R. (On the Application of v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-18
“…lawed because (among other reasons) it was unclear in its terms. As Lord Toulson, with whom the other members of the Supreme Court agreed, held in OPO v Rhodes [2016] AC 219, [79]:…”