How many times has [2016] ICR 721 been cited?

[2016] ICR 721 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] ICR 721

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2016] ICR 721

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville 2022-02-25
“…Windle v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 459; [2016] ICR 721, para 23…”
Cited — Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors 2018-12-19
“…t as the more elaborate definition of “worker” in the legislation with which we are concerned: see Secretary of State for Justice v Windle [2016] EWCA Civ 459, [2016] ICR 721, at paras. 7-10 (pp. 723-5), discussing the judgment of Lady Hale in Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co. [2014] UKSC 32, [2014] 1 WLR 2047.…”