How many times has [2017] 1 WLR 2199 been cited?

[2017] 1 WLR 2199 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2017] 1 WLR 2199

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2017] 1 WLR 2199

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Officer W80, R (on the application of) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct & Ors 2020-10-09
“…But see R (On the application of Erenbilge) v.IPCC[2013] EWHC 1397 (Admin),R (Duggan) v.North London Assistant Deputy Coroner [2017] EWCA Civ 142; [2017] 1 WLR 2199 at [76], Da Silva v. United Kingdom (2016) 63 EHHR 12at [275].…”
Cited — Maughan, R (On the Application Of) v Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire 2019-05-10
“…lling cases, the applicable standard of proof is the criminal standard. For example, in R (Duggan) v North London Assistant Deputy Coroner [2017] EWCA Civ 142, [2017] 1 WLR 2199, the decision proceeded on the footing that the requirements (in the context of the issues of unlawful killing and lawful killing there raised) were appropriat…”