- Cited — Rasal Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima & Ors 2023-05-15
“…ord Hoffmann in Arthur JS Hall & Co v Simons [2002] 1 AC 615 at 701, cited with approval by Simon LJ in Michael Wilson & Partners v Sinclair [2017] EWCA Civ 3; [2017] 1 WLR 2646 at [41]. He referred to the various cases cited by Simon LJ and to his reference, in his summary of principles at [48] to there being both a private interest a…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor. v Koza Altin Işletmeleri AS 2022-10-07
“…s. In Koza Ltd v Koza Altin [2020] EWCA Civ 1018, [2021] 1 WLR 170 at [34] Popplewell LJ cited the judgment of Simon LJ in Michael Wilson & Partners v Sinclair [2017] 1 WLR 2646 where at [48] that judge set out the principles, including (6):…”
- Cited — Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-07-28
“…ee for example Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2004] Ch 1 at paragraph 38 and Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Sinclair [2017] EWCA Civ 3; [2017] 1 WLR 2646 at paragraphs 39 to 48. Those summaries have emphasised the private interest of a party in not being vexed twice by litigation, the public interest of the stat…”
- Cited — Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors 2021-02-01
“…A review of the power to control abuse of process was given by Simon LJ in Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Sinclair [2017] 1 WLR 2646 at [39] to [48], ending with this summary:…”
- Cited — Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP v BTI 2014 LLC 2021-01-11
“…[2017] 1 WLR 2646.…”
- Applied — Koza Ltd & Anor v Koza Altin Isletmeleri AS 2020-07-31
“…There have been many decisions applying and refining these principles. In Michael Wilson & Partners v Sinclair [2017] 1 WLR 2646 Simon LJ reviewed a number of them and summarised their effect at [48] in the following terms:…”
- Cited — Playboy Club London Ltd v Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro Spa 2018-09-12
“…e burden is on BNL as defendant to identify reasons why bringing the second claim is manifestly unfair: Michael Wilson & Partners v Sinclair [2017] EWCA Civ 3; [2017] 1 WLR 2646, at [100] per Simon LJ (with whom the other members of the court agreed). The courts will not lightly shut out a party from pursuing a genuine claim, unless ab…”