How many times has [2017] PTSR 1112 been cited?

[2017] PTSR 1112 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2017] PTSR 1112

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2017] PTSR 1112

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Followed · 1

Cited — Thurston Parish Council, R (on the application of) v Mid Suffolk District Council & Anor. 2022-10-28
“…In R v Mendip District Council ex parte Fabre [2017] PTSR 1112 Sullivan J (as he then was) stated at [81] that, unlike a decision letter by a planning inspector, the purpose of an officer’s report is not to decide the issu…”
Followed — Thurston Parish Council, R (on the application of) v Mid Suffolk District Council & Anor. 2022-10-28
“…Hale of Richmond JSC in R (Morge) v Hampshire County Council [2011] PTSR 337, para 36 and the judgment of Sullivan J in R v Mendip District Council, Ex p Fabre [2017] PTSR 1112, 1120. Unless there is evidence to suggest otherwise, it may reasonably be assumed that, if the members followed the officer’s recommendation, they did so on t…”