- Cited — Dr Sanjay Pitalia & Anor v NHS England 2023-06-09
“…e cannot stand in the light of the subsequent observation of Lord Sumption JSC, giving the majority judgment of the Supreme Court in Barton v WrightHassall LLP [2018] 1 WLR 1119, that a claim form “expired” at the end of the period for service allowed under the Rules.…”
- Cited — London Borough of Islington v Said Bourous 2022-09-16
“…, at best, only persuasive. A litigant is not obliged to point out mistakes by his opponent, he submitted, referring to paragraph 22 of Barton v Wright Hassall [2018] 1 WLR 1119.…”
- Applied — The Good Law Project (R on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2022-03-24
“…ed to make an order under CPR 6.15 on the basis that there was no “good reason” to do so, applying the reasoning in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12; [2018] 1 WLR 1119 (“Barton”). She went on to refer to two first instance decisions in which permission for alternative service was refused: Piepenbrock v Associated Newspapers L…”
- Applied — Ideal Shopping Direct Limited & Ors. v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors. 2022-01-13
“…the power conferred by the rule. The judge referred to the decisions of the Supreme Court in Abela v Baadarani[2013] 1 WLR 2043 and Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] 1 WLR 1119. In the latter case, Lord Sumption summarised the general approach the court should adopt at [10] of his judgment. The judge then applied that general approach…”
- Followed — Walter Tzvi Soriano v Forensic News LLC & Ors. 2021-12-21
“…al rule, service of originating process is the act by which the defendant is subjected to the court’s jurisdiction: Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119 [8]. Although a case in which service is set aside on forum non conveniens grounds following an application under Part 11 is not so easily categorised as one w…”
- Cited — Cable v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd 2020-07-31
“…DJ Doyle, was a significant default, which is only exacerbated by the unhappy history. As Lord Sumption stressed in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119, the service of proceedings is a critically important step. He said at paragraph 9(2):…”
- Cited — Al Ahmed v London Borough of Tower Hamlets 2020-01-30
“…The same point may be made about Barton v Wright Hassall llp [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119, which concerned an application by the claimant, a litigant in person, for an order under CPR 6.15 validating service of the claim form retrospectively. Lord S…”
- Cited — AB (Termination of Pregnancy), Re 2019-07-11
“…I am conscious that, to borrow from Lord Sumption in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119, this is an appeal:…”
- Cited — Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors 2019-05-17
“…ant should not be accorded any leniency by virtue simply of his status as a litigant in person (seeLord Sumption in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119). Ms Marzec submitted that, on a fair reading of the transcript, the Claimant had not made such a concession.…”
- Cited — Grant v Dawn Meats (UK) 2018-10-16
“… rules, including Vinos v Marks and Spencer PLC [2001] EWCA Civ 1415, [2001] 3 All ER 784 (CA); and, more recently, Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12, [2018] 1 WLR 1119. In the latter case, a claimant acting in person purported to serve a claim form and particulars of claim by email in circumstances where prior permission for …”
- Cited — Société Générale v Goldas Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ithalat Ihracat A.S. & Ors 2018-05-15
“…se, in respect of which this court should not interfere unless the judge made an error of principle or the judge was plainly wrong, see Barton v Wright Hassall [2018] 1 WLR 1119 para 15 per Lord Sumption.…”
- Cited — Best Friends Group & Anor (t/a Best Friends) v Barclays Bank Plc 2018-03-28
“…nclusion that was plainly wrong. For what is only the most recent authoritative restatement of this well-established approach, see Barton v. Wright Hassall LLP [2018] 1 WLR 1119, Lord Sumption JSC at [15].…”