How many times has [2018] 2 WLR 1353 been cited?

[2018] 2 WLR 1353 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2018] 2 WLR 1353

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2018] 2 WLR 1353

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Lloyd v Google LLC 2019-10-02
“…ass were entitled to “user damages” or what the Supreme Court has now called “negotiating damages” (see One Step (Support) Ltd v. Morris-Garner [2018] UKSC 20, [2018] 2 WLR 1353 (“One…”
Cited — Classic Maritime Inc v Limbungan Makmur SDN BHD & Anor 2019-06-27
“…An even more recent decision of the Supreme Court is One Step (Support) Ltd v Morris-Garner [2018] UKSC 20, [2018] 2 WLR 1353, in which Lord Reed once again affirmed the compensatory principle:…”
Cited — W Nagel (A Firm) v Pluczenik Diamond Company NV 2018-11-28
“… available evidence: see Chitty on Contracts (32nd Ed, 2015), vol 1, para 26-015, cited with approval in One Step (Support) Ltd v Morris-Garner [2018] UKSC 20; [2018] 2 WLR 1353, para 38; Karim v Wemyss [2016] EWCA Civ 27, paras 43-49.…”