How many times has (2018) 66 EHRR 13 been cited?

(2018) 66 EHRR 13 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2018) 66 EHRR 13

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2018) 66 EHRR 13

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Re A (Parental Responsibility) 2023-06-16
“…hty reasons’ must be advanced to justify a distinction based upon a person’s birth status [Fabris v France [GC] (2013) 57 EHRR 19; Wolter and Sarfert v Germany (2018) 66 EHRR 13] or marital status [Sahin v Germany [GC] [2003] 2 FLR 671; Sommerfield v Germany [GC] (2004) 38 EHRR 35]. Ms Gallagher submitted that the court was, therefore,…”
Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…t complains, he or she would have had a right, enforceable under domestic law, in respect of the asset in question” (emphasis added). See also Wolter v Germany (2018) 66 EHRR 13, para 51.…”