- Considered — Syed Tahseen Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-09-28
“…l fact without considering whether it was dishonest. The judge should have adopted the approach to dishonesty set out in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67; [2018] AC 391 (Ivey v Genting). The judge did not, and did not scrutinise his findings carefully which he was required to do, because of their far-reaching consequences. Mr …”
- Cited — Amarjit Bhaur & Ors v Equity First Trustees (Nevis) Limited & Ors 2023-05-18
“…te of mind of the individual and then testing the individual’s conduct in light of that state of mind against an objective standard: see Ivey v Genting Casinos [2018] AC 391 at [74].…”
- Cited — The General Dental Council v Lucy Jane Williams 2023-05-05
“…In my judgment, the applicable principle was set out by Lord Hughes in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Limited [2017] UKSC 67; [2018] AC 391 at [74]. He said:…”
- Cited — Floreat Investment Management Limited v Benjamin Churchill & Ors 2023-04-25
“…ng as there was no dispute about it. The authorities, from Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] AC 378 to Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391, were reviewed by this court in Group Seven Ltd v Nasir [2019] EWCA Civ 614, [2020] Ch 129, and there is no need to repeat that exercise. As Lord Hughes put it…”
- Cited — Kenneth Davies v Stephen Ford & Ors. 2023-02-17
“…nce to the standards of ordinary decent people, objectively: see [349], referring to the test for dishonesty in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391.…”
- Cited — Mark Faulkner & Ors v Vollin Holdings Limited & Ors 2022-10-21
“…by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 (“Royal Brunei”) and more recently endorsed by the Supreme Court in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) [2018] AC 391 (“Ivey”).…”
- Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“…es International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37, [2006] 1 WLR 1476, at paragraph 10, and also Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391). However, there is no requirement that the defendant should have received property to which the trust or fiduciary obligation has ever attached.…”
- Considered — The Racing Partnership Ltd & Ors v Sports Information Services Ltd 2020-10-09
“…e’s own legal rights. I do not consider that this is affected by the reformulation of the test of dishonesty in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391. The example given by Lord Hughes at [60] is of the man who gets off the bus without paying, because he does not realise that public transport is not free. He,…”
- Cited — Simetra Global Assets Ltd & Anor v Ikon Finance Ltd & Ors 2019-08-09
“…The judge referred to Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391 (and now see also Group Seven at [57]) as showing that dishonesty is to be judged according to the standards of ordinary reasonable people, but there is no iss…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v BK (Afghanistan) 2019-07-30
“…the only possible truthful answer these questions was yes. Mr Malik referred us to Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd (trading as Crockfords Club) [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391, the well-known authority on the test for dishonesty in civil proceedings: see paragraph 74. Mr Malik accepted that the Tribunal’s decision on BK’s appeal pred…”
- Applied — Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-04-16
“…We were referred to the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC, [2018] AC 391, considering the correct approach to what constitutes dishonesty. The principles summarised by Lord Hughes at para. 74 of his judgment in that case will apply …”
- Cited — Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-04-16
“…be required in any event as a matter of domestic law. And, unlike in Ahsan (or Kiarie and Byndloss v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391), there is no issue as to the fairness of the available procedures for a legal challenge.…”
- Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…(UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67, [2018] AC 391 (“Ivey”), judgment in which was delivered on 25 October 2017 less than three weeks after Morgan J had handed down his judgment in the present case. The issue i…”
- Disapproved — Raychaudhuri v General Medical Council 2018-09-14
“…he hearing before Sweeney J this approach to dishonesty was disapproved by the Supreme Court by its judgment in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67; [2018] AC 391 and replaced with a different approach. Before Sweeney J and before us it was common ground that the approach to dishonesty in relation to findings made by a M…”