- Considered — McMahon v Watford Borough Council 2020-04-08
“… Hotak has been considered in a number of subsequent cases in this court. They include Panayiotou v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1624, [2018] QB 1232 and Guiste v Lambeth LBC [2019] EWCA Civ 1758.…”
- Cited — James v Hertsmere Borough Council 2020-04-02
“…dth of the s. 204 jurisdiction for which the Appellant contends. However, this approach was questioned in Panayiotou v Waltham Forest LBC [2017] EWCA Civ 1624; [2018] QB 1232. That concerned two appeals from statutory review decisions. One (Smith) raised an argument that had been rejected in Tachie, namely that the local authority’s…”
- Cited — Guiste v The London Borough of Lambeth 2019-10-22
“…KSC 30, [2016] AC 811. She also referred to the further guidance given by this court in Panayiotou v Waltham ForestLondon Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1624, [2018] QB 1232. At paragraphs 24 and 25 of the Review Decision, Ms Ubiam described the nature of the Hotak test in terms of which no criticism has been made:…”
- Cited — Adesotu v Lewisham London Borough Council 2019-08-02
“…isminic sense” was therefore capable of being taken. On the other hand, in a postscript to his judgment in Panayiotou v Waltham ForestLBC [2017] EWCA Civ 1624; [2018] QB 1232 at 90 Lewison LJ, having referred to the decision in Tachie, said that he would not regard the point as by any means settled. He expressed his disquiet that su…”