How many times has [2019] 1 WLR 365 been cited?

[2019] 1 WLR 365 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2019] 1 WLR 365

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2019] 1 WLR 365

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Halil Celik v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-07-31
“…or a different status under a different scheme. Ms Smyth relied on the decision in Macastena v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1558, [2019] 1 WLR 365 and CS (Brazil) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] Imm. AR 1 as supportive of that submission.…”
Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Aibangbee 2019-03-07
“…e argument based on Ojo. He relied instead on the recent decision of this court in Macastena v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1558, [2019] 1 WLR 365 (“Macastena”) as establishing that a period of residence by an extended family member prior to the issue of a residence card does not count towards the period …”