How many times has [2020] 1 WLR 2802 been cited?

[2020] 1 WLR 2802 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2020] 1 WLR 2802

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2020] 1 WLR 2802

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Considered · 1

Cited — National Highways Limited v Person Unknown & Anor 2023-02-23
“…unknown, Ineos Upstream Ltd v Persons Unknown(“Ineos”) [2019] EWCA Civ 515; [2019] 4 WLR 100 and Canada Goose Retail Ltd v Persons Unknown [2020] EWCA Civ 202; [2020] 1 WLR 2802. He summarised the combined effect of those cases as being:…”
Considered — Sharif v Birmingham City Council 2020-11-10
“…type) in this court in Ineos Upstream Limited v Persons Unknown [2019] 4 WLR 100 and Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd v Persons Unknown [2020] 1 WLR 2802. It may have to be considered again in any future case about injunctions to restrain anti-social behaviour by persons unknown. I simply record that we were tol…”