How many times has [2020] 4 WLR 89 been cited?

[2020] 4 WLR 89 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2020] 4 WLR 89

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2020] 4 WLR 89

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-07-28
“…s will amount to an abuse of process, see In re Norris [2001] UKHL 34; [2001] 1 WLR 1388 but this is not unknown, see Tinkler v Ferguson [2020] EWHC 1467 (QB); [2020] 4 WLR 89, affirmed on appeal [2021] EWCA Civ 18; [2021] 4 WLR 27.…”
Cited — Fiona George v Linda Cannell & Anor 2022-07-27
“…d acted in serious breach of his duties to Stobart and had been lawfully dismissed and removed from his office (“the Stobart Judgment”): [2020] EWHC 1467 (QB), [2020] 4 WLR 89. Nicklin J also heldthat the pleadings, drafted by the claimant as a litigant in person, disclosed no reasonable basis for a case on damage. This court dismiss…”