UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2020] AC 51
[2020] AC 51
· cited by
3
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2020] AC 51
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Explained · 1
Citation network
[2020] AC 51
MR (Pakistan) & Anor v Secretary o
Durand Education Trust, R (On the
The Motherhood Plan (R on the appl
cited by
Cited by (3)
Cited
—
The Motherhood Plan (R on the application of) v HM Treasury
2021-11-24
“…[2020] AC 51, at para. 8:…”
Cited
—
MR (Pakistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for Justice & Orse
2021-04-14
“…was common ground that these issues, although jurisprudentially distinct, overlapped in practice, see R(Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice [2018] UKSC 59; [2020] AC 51 at paragraph 148.…”
Explained
—
Durand Education Trust, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Education
2020-12-08
“…As Baroness Hale explained in R (Stott) v Justice Secretary [2018] UKSC 59, [2020] AC 51 at paragraph 207, in article 14 cases:…”
Frequently cited alongside
R v Secretary of State for Justice [2018] UKSC 59
3×
[2007] 1 WLR 1420
2×
[2007] UKHL 19
2×
[1984] 11 WLR 704
1×
[1992] AC 58
1×
[2011] 1 WLR 1299
1×
[2012] AC 245
1×
[2015] 1 WLR 5341
1×