- Cited — EOG v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-03-17
“…s expressed in the Guidance. She sought to justify her change of position on the basis that in R (SC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2021] UKSC 26, [2021] 3 WLR 428, in which judgment had been handed down only a few days previously, the Supreme Court had re-stated the relevant principles in a way which made it clear that t…”
- Cited — CN (R on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2022-02-04
“…or more of the substantive rights or freedoms set forth in the Convention or its protocols”: R (SC) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] UKSC 26, [2021] 3 WLR 428 at [36] (“SC”). Therefore, it is not enough for CN to say that he is experiencing discrimination. He must show that he is experiencing discrimination which int…”
- Considered — Aviva Insurance Limited v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2022-01-14
“…graph 64 by using materials in this way the Court would not be “questioning” proceedings in Parliament. In R(SC) v Works and Pensions Secretary [2021] UKSC 26; [2021] 3 WLR 428 at paragraph 163 Lord Reed returned to the use which can be made of Parliamentary debates and other Parliamentary material when considering whether primary leg…”
- Cited — H (R on the application of) v Swindon Borough Council 2021-12-03
“…on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings 2005 (“the Anti-Trafficking Convention”). The Supreme Court in R(SC) v Work and Pension Secretary [2021] UKSC 26; [2021] 3 WLR 428 at paragraph 81 recorded that international courts, such as the ECtHR, in defining the meaning of terms and notions in the text of the ECHR, can and must take …”
- Followed — The Motherhood Plan (R on the application of) v HM Treasury 2021-11-24
“…-53 of the judgment of Lord Reed (with which the other members of the Supreme Court agreed) in R (SC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2021] UKSC 26, [2021] 3 WLR 428. At para. 49 Lord Reed quotes a passage from the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (“the ECtHR”) in Guberina v Croatia(2018) 66 EHRR 11 as follows…”