[2022] Env.L.R. 17
· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100
Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite[2022] Env.L.R. 17
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
Cited by (2)
- Cited — Elliott Cuciurean v Secretary of State for Transport & Anor 2022-11-17
“… Civ 357 (“Cuciurean”); Attorney General v Crosland [2021] UKSC 15; [2021] 4 WLR 103 (“Crosland”); National Highways Limited v Heyatawin [2021] EWHC 3078 (KB); [2022] Env.L.R. 17 (“Heyatawin”); National Highways Limited v Buse & Others. [2021] EWHC 3404 (QB) (“Buse”) and National Highways Ltd v Springorum and Others [2022] EWHC 205 (QB)…”
- Cited — Breen & Ors. v Esso Petroleum Company Limited 2022-10-26
“…A Civ 357 (“Cuciurean”); Attorney General v Crosland [2021] UKSC 15; [2021] 4WLR 103 (“Crosland”); National Highways Limited v Heyatawin [2021] EWHC 3078 (KB); [2022] Env.L.R. 17 (“Heyatawin”); National Highways Limited v Buse & Others. [2021] EWHC 3404 (QB) (“Buse”) and National Highways Ltd v Springorum and Others [2022] EWHC 205 (QB)…”
Frequently cited alongside