- Cited — Granville Technology Group Limited (in liquidation) & Ors v LG Display Co Limited & Anor 2023-08-16
“…would have been in if the tort had not been committed. A classic statement of this principle is that of Lord Blackburn in Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25, 39; (1880) 7 R (HL) 1, 7:…”
- Cited — Dr Craig Wright v Peter McCormack 2023-07-26
“…on as he would have been in if he had not sustained the wrong for which he is now getting his compensation or reparation”: Livingston v Raywards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25, 39 (Lord Blackburn). However, a number of important limits are engrafted on this general rule which may lead to compensation being less than the loss calculat…”
- Cited — Charlotte Victoria Hassam & Anor. v Yoann Samuel Rabot & Anor. 2023-01-20
“…ion of PSLA damages, like any other type of damages for the commission of a tort, is that identified by Lord Blackburn in Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25, 39:…”
- Cited — Charlotte Victoria Hassam & Anor. v Yoann Samuel Rabot & Anor. 2023-01-20
“…They submitted that the principle of full compensation was applicable to damages for PSLA. As Lord Blackburn had said in Livingstone v. Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25 (Livingstone) at page 39: “where any injury is to be compensated by damages, in settling the sum of money to be given for reparation of damages you should as n…”
- Cited — MDW Holdings Limited v James Robert Horvill & Ors. 2022-06-28
“…As Lord Blackburn noted in Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25, at 39, it is:…”
- Cited — Michael Anthony Tuke v Derek Hood 2022-01-14
“…ongdoer”. At 280 E-F, Lord Steyn confirmed that there had been “no retreat from” the policy spelt out by Lord Blackburn in Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co(1880) 5 App Cas 25 at 39:…”
- Cited — Glossop Cartons and Print Ltd & Ors v Contact (Print & Packaging) Ltd & Ors 2021-05-07
“…ould say everything would be taken into view that would go most against the wilful wrongdoer” (see Lord Blackburn in Livingstone v. The Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25 at page 39). In short, the benefits received by the buyer are to be determined objectively, not subjectively.…”
- Cited — Swift v Carpenter & Anor 2020-10-09
“…nt with the fundamental principle of fair and reasonable compensation for those injured by another’s negligence: see Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Company (1880) 5 App Cas 25.…”
- Cited — Assetco Plc v Grant Thornton UK LLP 2020-08-28
“…ven for any of these amounts. GT cited well-known authorities on the compensatory purpose of an award of damages, such as Livingstone v Raywards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25 and Hodgson v Trapp [1989] AC 807 in which Lord Bridge said at 819: “If, in consequence of the injuries sustained, the plaintiff has enjoyed receipts to which …”
- Cited — XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust 2018-12-19
“…t in the position in which she would have been had the tort not taken place. This was clearly stated by Lord Blackburn in Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25, 39:…”
- Cited — Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a firm) 2018-06-06
“…(1880) 5 App Cas 25…”