How many times has Case C-170/13 been cited?

Case C-170/13 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-170/13

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-170/13

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors. v Apple Retail U.K. Limited & Ors. 2022-10-27
“… Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd [2017] EWHC 1304 (Pat) (“UP Remedies”) and the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment in Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies Co Ltd v ZTE Corp [EU:C:2015:477], at [71]-[134].…”
Cited — Vestel Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. & Anor v Access Advance LLC & Anor 2021-03-26
“…t infringement proceedings against Vestel in Germany. Amongst other things they contended that the PPL terms are FRAND and so the requirements of Huawei v ZTE (Case C-170/13) EU:C:2015:477 are satisfied.…”
Cited — Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor (Rev 1) 2018-10-23
“…Thirdly and in light of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “CJEU”) in Case C-170/13 Huawei v ZTE [2015] Bus LR 1261, the owner of a SEP cannot, without infringing Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the “TFEU”),…”