How many times has Case C-392/97 been cited?

Case C-392/97 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-392/97

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-392/97

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Teva UK Ltd & Ors v Gilead Sciences, Inc 2019-12-19
“…what is meant by a product being protected by a basic patent for the purposes of Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. The earliest case referred to the CJEU was Case C-392/97 Farmitalia Carlo ErbaSrl [2000] RPC 580, when it was asked, not for the last time:…”
Cited — Sandoz Ltd & Anor v G.D. Searle LLC & Anor 2018-01-25
“…In Case C-392/97 Farmitalia Carlo Erba Srl [2000] RPC 580, Farmitalia had obtained a German patent for idarubicin. The claims of the patent specifically covered idarubicin hydr…”