- Followed — Luca Manetta v Katia de Filppo 2022-03-29
“…l responsibility and no ruling on any financial claim was required in the judicial separation proceedings because, following the decision of the CJEU in A v B (Case C-489/14) [2016] 1 FLR 31, “claims for child support are ancillary to the jurisdiction to rule on parental responsibility”. The husband’s appeal against this declaratio…”
- Cited — Luca Manetta v Katia de Filppo 2022-03-29
“…ons of Italian law. She then cited the relevant provisions from Brussels IIA and the English and CJEU case law to which she had been referred, including A v B (Case C-489/14) [2016] 1 FLR 313, E v E [2015] EWHC 3742 (Fam), [2017] 1 FLR 658 and Guisti v Ferragamo [2019] EWCA Civ 691.…”
- Applied — Giusti v Ferragamo 2019-04-17
“…eedings were continuing, the wife would need to establish that the lis pendens provisions in Article 19 did not apply. Reference was made to the case of A v B, Case C-489/14, [2016] Fam 345, [2016] 1 FLR 31 but it was argued that the circumstances of that case were different because of “the clear continuation of the Italian divorce…”
- Cited — Thum v Thum 2018-07-12
“… to be determined autonomously. Accordingly, under Article 16 the question of when a court is seised is to be determined autonomously: see, for example, A v B (Case C-489/14) paragraph 106 of Advocate General P Cruz Villalon’s Opinion and paragraph 29 of the judgment; and MH v MH paragraph 25.…”