How many times has Case C-495/03 been cited?

Case C-495/03 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-495/03

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-495/03

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Invamed Group Ltd & Ors v Revenue And Customs 2020-02-25
“…anatory notes must also be consistent with the provisions of the CN and cannot alter their scope: see Intermodal Transports BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën Case C-495/03: [2005] ECRI- 08151.…”
Cited — Hasbro European Trading BV v Revenue & Customs 2018-05-25
“…ontent of the Explanatory Notes must therefore be compatible with the provisions of the CN, and cannot alter the meaning of those provisions. See, for example, Case C-495/03 Intermodal Transports BV v Staatssecretaris van Financien, [2005] ECR I-8151, at paragraphs 47 and 48.…”
Cited — Hasbro European Trading BV v Revenue & Customs 2018-05-25
“…visions (see, in particular, Case C-280/97 ROSE Elektrotechnik [1999] ECR I-689, paragraph 23; Case C-42/99 Eru Portuguesa [2000] ECR I-7691, paragraph 20; and Case C-495/03 Intermodal Transports [2005] ECR I-8151, paragraph 48).”…”