How many times has [2001] EWCA Civ 406 been cited?

[2001] EWCA Civ 406 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] EWCA Civ 406

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] EWCA Civ 406

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Pretoria Energy Company (Chittering) Limited v Blankley Estates Limited 2023-05-09
“…estion or where the parties have acted in the belief that they have a binding contract: Mamidoil-Jetoil Greek Petroleum Company SA v Okta Crude Oil Refinery AD [2001] EWCA Civ 406 at [69]. I bear in mind that business people may record important agreements in a summary way: Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd [1932] All ER Rep 494 at 503.…”
Cited — NHS Commissioning Board (Known As NHS England) v Vasant (t/a MK Vasant & Associates) & Ors 2019-07-16
“…spute resolution procedure may act as a safety valve to deal with any potential uncertainty: Mamidoil-Jetoil Greek Petroleum Co SA v Otka Crude Oil Refinery AD [2001] EWCA Civ 406, [2001] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 76 at [69].…”