How many times has [2002] EWCA Civ 1040 been cited?

[2002] EWCA Civ 1040 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] EWCA Civ 1040

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 1Applied · 1

Followed — Re AZ (A Child) (Recusal) 2022-07-05
“…ng on 25 March 2021 (which we consider in connection with another issue below), Mr Uddin cited the dicta of Gloster LJ in Teinaz v London Borough of Wandsworth [2002] EWCA Civ 1040, [2002] IRLR 721, including the following passage at paragraph 22:…”
Applied — Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v Tradition Financial Services Ltd 2021-02-22
“…In Teinaz v Wandsworth London BC [2002] EWCA Civ 1040 (“Teinaz”) the applicant had brought a complaint to the Employment Tribunal of racial discrimination and unfair dismissal, and applied to adjourn the hearing o…”