How many times has [2002] EWCA Civ 1964 been cited?

[2002] EWCA Civ 1964 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] EWCA Civ 1964

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Rehana Azhar v All Money Matters T/A TFC Home Loans 2023-11-16
“…discretion was “clearly wholly wrongly exercised”: see Eagil Trust Co Ltd v Pigott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119 and Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance PLC v T&N Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1964, at [38] and [47].”…”
Cited — N (A CHILD) (INSTRUCTION OF EXPERT) 2022-12-06
“… account a relevant factor or has regard to an irrelevant factor or reaches a decision that was plainly wrong: Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance PLC v T & N Lts [2002] EWCA Civ 1964, Jalla and another v Shell International Trading and Shipping Co Ltd (Appeal 3: Refusal to Extend Time) [2021] EWCA Civ 1559.…”