How many times has [2002] EWCA Civ 56 been cited?

[2002] EWCA Civ 56 is cited by 5 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] EWCA Civ 56

· cited by 5 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] EWCA Civ 56

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Explained · 2Cited · 2Followed · 1

Cited — Andrew McCarthy v William Allan Jones & Anor. 2023-05-25
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 56, [2003] 3 All ER 434 at [2]:…”
Followed — Sofia Bogolyubova v Gennadiy Bogolyubov & Anor 2023-05-18
“…In SCT Finance v Bolton [2002] EWCA Civ 56, Wilson J (as he then was) started the judgment of the court at para.[2] with the following:…”
Explained — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…b) if so, what order to make. An appeal court can only interfere on very limited grounds. As Wilson J (sitting in this court) explained in SCT Finance v Bolton [2002] EWCA Civ 56 at [1]:…”
Explained — Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Limited & Anor. v Generics (UK) Limited & Anor. 2022-03-29
“… to that effect, but the reasons for it were explained with particular clarity by Wilson J, with whom Waller and Rix LJJ agreed, in SCT Finance Ltd v Bolton at [2002] EWCA Civ 56, [2003] 2 All ER 434 at [2]:…”
Cited — Hislop v Perde 2018-07-23
“…se of discretion concerns the award of costs, the discretion could be regarded as at its widest. As Wilson J (as he then was) said SCT Finance Limited v Bolton [2002] EWCA Civ 56; [2003] 3 All ER 434:…”