- Cited — Pankim Kumar Patel v Minerva Services Delaware, Inc & Ors 2023-02-10
“…unless he is restrained from doing so and that it would be just and convenient, in all the circumstances, to grant the order: Thane Investments Ltd v Tomlinson [2003] EWCA Civ 1272 at [21]. It is also accepted that the judge was correct to refer to Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Morimoto [2020] 2 All ER (Comm) 359 at [34] and Fundo Sobe…”
- Cited — Crowther v Crowther & Ors 2020-06-16
“…need re-stating. It nevertheless is useful to remind oneself of the succinct summary of the test by Peter Gibson LJ in Thane Investments Ltd v Tomlinson (No 1) [2003] EWCA Civ 1272 at [21] where he stated that, before making a WFO, the court must be satisfied that:…”
- Cited — Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Morimoto 2019-12-11
“…need re-stating. It nevertheless is useful to remind oneself of the succinct summary of the test by Peter Gibson LJ in Thane Investments Ltd v Tomlinson (No 1) [2003] EWCA Civ 1272 at [21] where he stated that, before making a WFO, the court must be satisfied that:…”
- Considered — Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Morimoto 2019-12-11
“…I have considered the relevant authorities in this area, in particular: Thane Investments Ltd v Tomlinson (No 1) [2003] EWCA Civ 1272 at [28]; Norwich Union Fire Insurance Ltd v Eden [2003] EWCA Civ 1272, at [21] per Phillips LJ; Jarvis Field Press v. Chelton [2003] EWHC 2674 (Ch) per Patten …”
- Considered — Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Morimoto 2019-12-11
“…I have considered the relevant authorities in this area, in particular: Thane Investments Ltd v Tomlinson (No 1) [2003] EWCA Civ 1272 at [28]; Norwich Union Fire Insurance Ltd v Eden [2003] EWCA Civ 1272, at [21] per Phillips LJ; Jarvis Field Press v. Chelton [2003] EWHC 2674 (Ch) per Patten …”
- Applied — Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Morimoto 2019-12-11
“…g to this conclusion I have applied the approach of this court in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp and in Thane Investments Ltd v Tomlinson (No 1) [2003] EWCA Civ 1272 at [28] namely that the court should scrutinise whether what is alleged in relation to a good arguable case really justifies the inference of a risk of dissipa…”