How many times has [2003] EWCA Civ 1668 been cited?

[2003] EWCA Civ 1668 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWCA Civ 1668

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — David Greene v David Davies 2022-03-29
“… things, Spencer Bower & Handley, Res Judicata, 5th ed (2019), at paragraph 8.25, and Good Challenger Navegante SA v Metalexportimport SA (The Good Challenger) [2003] EWCA Civ 1668; [2004] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 67, Lewison LJ concluded in paragraph 51 that “even if a ‘twin ratio’ decision can create an estoppel in relation to both rationes, an in…”
Cited — Thomas v Luv One Luv All Promotions Ltd & Anor 2021-05-20
“…Although Spencer Bower and Handley put the point very clearly, the case law in this jurisdiction has been more guarded. In The Good Challenger [2003] EWCA Civ 1668, [2004] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 67 Clarke LJ discussed the question. The case was one in which the claimants sought to enforce an arbitration award; but the defendants s…”