- Cited — Aminat Saliu v The Entry Clearance Officer 2021-12-03
“… was wrong in law was dismissed. The principles are well-established, and set out in the leading cases of Kugathas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31, [2003] INLR 170, Singh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 630, and PT (Sri Lanka) v Entry Clearance Officer, Chennai[2016] EWCA Civ …”
- Approved — P (Discharge of Party), Re 2021-04-16
“… must be a family life which attracts respect. Not all relationships between related adults give rise to a right to respect for family life. In Kugathas v SSHD [2003] EWCA Civ 31 at paragraph 14, Sedley LJ approved a statement by the European Commission of Human Rights in S v UK (1984) 40 DR 196:…”
- Cited — Uddin v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2020-03-12
“…[2003] EWCA Civ 31 (which was itself a citation from the Commission’s report in S v United Kingdom [1984] 40 DR 196), and she acknowledged that dependency was not limited to bein…”
- Followed — OB (Ukraine) v Entry Clearance Officer 2019-05-02
“…ed approach in failing to follow the step-by-step principles in R (Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 and in failing to identify, in accordance with Kugathas v SSHD [2003] EWCA Civ 31, what was the relationship between the appellant, his daughter and grandson that warranted the protection of Article 8. The judge set aside the FTT's determina…”
- Cited — KK (India) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-03-07
“…family members depends on the circumstances of the particular case and requires proof of dependency “more than normal emotional ties” (per Arden LJ in Kugathas [2003] EWCA Civ 31, at paragraph [35]). Financial dependency is a relevant factor but there is no case in which it alone has been held to be sufficient.…”
- Cited — Mwesezi v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-15
“…ists with the adult family members with whom he has been living, because of an element of dependency (see Kugathas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31; [2003] INLR 170). However, the element of dependency identified by the FTT is purely economic in nature, as part of an arrangement of which the appellant (not…”
- Cited — Ribeli v Entry Clearance Officer, Pretoria 2018-03-27
“…er child) who live in different countries. There has to be something more than normal emotional ties: see Kugathas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31; [2003] INLR 170. In this case it is said on behalf of the Appellant that there is more: in particular that the Appellant needs to be close to her daughter so …”