How many times has [2005] EWCA Civ 618 been cited?

[2005] EWCA Civ 618 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] EWCA Civ 618

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] EWCA Civ 618

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — National Iranian Oil Company v Crescent Petroleum Company International Ltd & Anor 2023-07-13
“…ial decision at all (Aden Refinery Co Ltd v Ugland Management Co Ltd [1987] QB 650) or a decision is made without jurisdiction (Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 618, [2005] 1 WLR 3555), but these exceptions are not relevant here.…”
Cited — London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins Assoc Ltd v Kingdom of Spain 2021-11-04
“…that “the court” in question is the court of first instance and not the Court of Appeal: see section 105(1) of the same Act and Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 618, [2005] 1WLR 3555 at [20].…”
Cited — Sabbagh v Khoury & Ors 2019-07-12
“…He cited a number of cases, of which three related to foreign arbitrations: Weissfisch v Julius, Albon v Naza Motor Trading and Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 618, [2005] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 494 at [74]. It is these authorities that have also been relied on in subsequent Commercial Court decisions for the existence of the powe…”