How many times has [2006] EWCA Civ 1340 been cited?

[2006] EWCA Civ 1340 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] EWCA Civ 1340

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd. 2022-10-27
“…ted. However, leaving aside a residual discretion which exists more in theory than in practice (CGU International Insurance Plc v Astra Zeneca Insurance Co Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1340, [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 501), a further appeal to this court is only possible with the permission of the court below and even then requires that “the question …”
Cited — Kearney v Hampshire Police 2019-10-31
“…otherwise be violated, to remedy the unfairness otherwise created by s.18(1) SCA, as discussed in CGU International Insurance Plc v AstraZeneca InsuranceCo Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1340, [2007] Bus LR 162.…”
Cited — Binning Property Corporation Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor 2019-02-28
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 405, [2002] 4 All E.R. 390 and CGU International Insurance Plc v AstraZeneca Insurance Co. Ltd. [2006] EWCA Civ 1340 (paragraphs 13 and 14). But the principle was still good. As Sullivan L.J. said (in paragraph 15):…”