“… a normal case because a successful appeal against the s. 184 Decision could be of enduring benefit to her in the sense identified in Deugi v Tower Hamlets LBC [2006] EWCA Civ 159. She identifies four factors which she says support her submission. They are:…”
“…nefit or advantage in pursuing the appeal against the first decision of which he/she should not be deprived: see Deugi v Tower Hamlet LBC [2006] H.L.R. at [28];[2006] EWCA Civ 159 at [32], per May LJ (which whom Rix and Gage LJJ agreed). However, none of that should rule out the possibility of parties agreeing an open-ended extension of …”