How many times has [2006] EWCA Civ 658 been cited?

[2006] EWCA Civ 658 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] EWCA Civ 658

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2006] EWCA Civ 658

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors 2019-07-12
“…as to require the patentee to give notice to the Department of Health in case it wished to seek such an undertaking: SmithKline Beecham plc v Apotex Europe Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 658, [2007] Ch. 71 at [76]-[77].…”
Cited — BV Nederlandse Industrie Van Eiprodukten v Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. 2019-04-09
“…In Smithkline Beecham PLC & Others v Apotex Europe Limited & Others[2006] EWCA Civ 658; [2007] Ch 71, Jacob LJ stressed that none of the speeches in either Linden Gardensor Panatown “begin to regard, as within the concept of ‘performance interest…”