How many times has [2009] EWCA Civ 10 been cited?

[2009] EWCA Civ 10 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] EWCA Civ 10

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2009] EWCA Civ 10

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — EY (Fact-finding hearing), Re 2023-10-27
“…[2009] EWCA Civ 10, [2009] 1 FLR 1145 at paragraph 15, Wall LJ said:…”
Cited — A, B & C (Fact-Finding: Gonorrhoea) 2023-04-26
“…In Re G and B (Fact-Finding Hearing) [2009] EWCA Civ 10, Wall LJ accepted that a judge “is not required slavishly to adhere to a schedule of proposed findings placed before her by a local authority”, but added this …”
Considered — A (No. 2) (Children: Findings of Fact) 2019-11-14
“…it, to make findings of fact that have not been sought by the parties, but they should be cautious when considering doing so: Re G and B (Fact-Finding Hearing) [2009] EWCA Civ 10; [2009] 1 FLR 1145, where Wall LJ said this:…”