- Cited — VA (Medical Treatment), Re 2023-10-13
“…an a trial may be relevant to whether or not a party has behaved reasonably in relation to the litigation. As Wall LJ pointed out in EM v SW, In re M (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 311, there are differences between trials and appeals. At first instance, ‘nobody knows what the judge is going to find’ (paragraph 23), whereas on appeal the fact…”
- Cited — Re N and A (1996 Hague Convention: Costs) 2023-07-25
“…an a trial may be relevant to whether or not a party has behaved reasonably in relation to the litigation. As Wall LJ pointed out in EM v SW, In re M (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 311, there are differences between trials and appeals. At first instance, ‘nobody knows what the judge is going to find’ (paragraph 23), whereas on appeal the fact…”
- Cited — W (A Child), Re 2020-02-05
“…[2009] EWCA Civ 311,…”
- Cited — RP (Appeal costs) 2019-04-16
“…han a trial may be relevant to whether or not a party has behaved reasonably in relation to the litigation. As Wall LJ pointed out in EM v SW, In reM (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 311, there are differences between trials and appeals. At first instance, ‘nobody knows what the judge is going to find’ (paragraph 23), whereas on appeal the fact…”