How many times has [2010] EWCA Civ 1396 been cited?

[2010] EWCA Civ 1396 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2010] EWCA Civ 1396

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Ingenious Games LLP & Ors. v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-07-19
“…ourt to reopen a decision on the grounds merely that the wrong result was reached. There is a very clear illustration of this in Barclays Bank plc v Guy (No 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 1396, another decision of this Court. There Lloyd LJ, first on paper and then again sitting with Carnwath LJ at an oral hearing, had refused permission to appeal on…”
Cited — Wingfield, R (on the application of) v Canterbury City Council & Anor 2020-11-27
“…trated” and “where it is demonstrated that the integrity of the earlier litigation process … has been critically undermined”. In Barclays Bank Plc v Guy (No 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 1396, [2011] 1 WLR 681, Lord Neuberger M.R. said that reopening might be justifiable if “the judge had completely failed to understand a clearly articulated point”,…”